Gateway One Lending & Finance, LLC v. Golden Auto Brokers Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Gateway One Lending & Finance, LLC
Defendant: Golden Auto Brokers Incorporated and Ray Maurice Hamilton
Case Number: 1:2015cv01808
Filed: May 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPINION AND ORDER. The Court will hold an evidentiary hearing to receive evidence regarding the damages claimed for the breaches of contract, fraud, and attorney's fees. The hearing will be held on January 16, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 17 05, Richard B. Russell Federal Building and Courthouse, 75 Ted Turner Drive, S.W., Atlanta, GA 30303. At the hearing, Plaintiff shall present evidence on the following issues: (1) the amount of damages it claims for breaches of each of the Contracts (Count I through Count IX); (2) the amount of damages it seeks for its fraud claim against Defendant Hamilton and Defendant Golden Auto; (3) the attorneys fees it seeks under O.C.G.A. § 13611; and (4) the grounds and calculation for the award of $11,656.38 in additional attorneys fees. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 12/14/2017. (bgt)
March 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER vacating the Clerk's Entry of Default. Plaintiff Gateway One Lending & Finance, LLCs Motion for Entry of Default Judgment 10 is denied without prejudice. It is further ordered that Plaintiff shall, on or before March 24, 2017 , serve, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, its Amended Complaint on Defendants and file with the Court its proof of service. Defendants shall, pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, have fourteen (14) days after ser vice of the Amended Complaint within which to respond to it. If Defendants fail to respond within the time period allowed, Plaintiff may, within twenty one (21) days of Defendants failure to respond, file its motion for default judgment. The Court will not allow Plaintiff any further opportunities to follow the proper procedure to obtain the default judgment it seeks. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 3/10/17. (ddm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gateway One Lending & Finance, LLC v. Golden Auto Brokers Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gateway One Lending & Finance, LLC
Represented By: John Gregory McCullough
Represented By: Christopher J. Reading
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Golden Auto Brokers Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Maurice Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?