Berry College, Inc. v. Rhoda et al
Plaintiff: Berry College, Inc.
Defendant: Richard G. Rhoda and Stephanie Bellard Chase
Case Number: 4:2013cv00115
Filed: May 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: Floyd
Presiding Judge: Harold L Murphy
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2013 Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered dismissing action without prejudice. (jta)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist--
June 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #9 , and DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendants. The Court DENIES AS MOOT AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's Motion for TRO #5 , and CONTINUES the hearing on that Motion that presently isscheduled for Thursday, June 13, 2013. Signed by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 6/12/13. (jta)
June 12, 2013 Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Stephanie Bellard Chase, Richard G. Rhoda. (jta)
June 12, 2013 Civil Case Terminated. (jta)
June 12, 2013 Submission of #10 Order with defts' #9 MOTION to Dismiss, with pla's #11 response, and defts' #12 replysubmitted to District Judge Harold L. Murphy. (jta)
June 11, 2013 Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Berry College, Inc.. (Marquardt, Christopher)
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file its response, if any, re Defendants' #9 MOTION to Dismiss BY NO LATER THAN 12:00 noon E.D.T. ON TUESDAY, JUNE 11, 2013. The Court ORDERS Defendants to file their reply, if any, in support of the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction BY NO LATER THAN 12:00 noon E.D.T. ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 12, 2013. Signed by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 6/7/13. (jta)
June 7, 2013 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss (titled Limited Appearance for the Purpose of Moving for Dismissal) with Brief In Support by Stephanie Bellard Chase, Richard G. Rhoda. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(jta)
June 7, 2013 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jay C. Ballard on behalf of Stephanie Bellard Chase, Richard G. Rhoda. (jta)
June 7, 2013 Clerks Certificate of Mailing (e-mailed due to shortened briefing schedule)as to Jay C. Ballard attorney for Stephanie Bellard Chase, Richard G. Rhoda re #10 Order. (jta)
June 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Court DIRECTS counsel for Parties to appear before the Court for a hearing on Plaintiff's pending #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order at 10:30 a.m. E.D.T. on Thursday, June 13, 2013.1 The Court further DIRECTS counsel for Plaintiff to provide counsel for Defendants with notice of the scheduled hearing. Finally, The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to MAIL a copy of this Order to counsel for Defendants: Jay Ballard, Office of the Attorney General and Reporter, P.O. Box 20207, Nashville, Tennessee, 37202-0207. Signed by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 6/4/13. (jta)
June 4, 2013 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Motion Hearing set for 6/13/2013 at 10:30 AM in ROME Courtroom 300 before Judge Harold L. Murphy. Modified on 6/4/2013 to edit text(jta).
June 4, 2013 Clerks Certificate of Mailing re #7 Order, as directed, to counsel for defendants Jay Ballard, Office of the Attorney General and Reporter, P.O. Box 20207, Nashville, Tennessee, 37202-0207. (jta)
May 14, 2013 Filing 6 Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons. Approved by Judge Harold L. Murphy on 5/14/13. (jta)
May 14, 2013 Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order with Brief In Support by Berry College, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief)(Marquardt, Christopher)
May 14, 2013 Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Stephanie Bellard Chase. (jta)
May 14, 2013 Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Richard G. Rhoda. (jta)
May 13, 2013 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Berry College, Inc.. (jta)
May 13, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Berry College, Inc.. Consent form to proceed before U.S. Magistrate and pretrial instructions provided. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113E-4576368.) (Attachments: #1 List of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(jta) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berry College, Inc. v. Rhoda et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Berry College, Inc.
Represented By: Brooks A Suttle
Represented By: Christopher Carl Marquardt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard G. Rhoda
Represented By: Jay C. Ballard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephanie Bellard Chase
Represented By: Jay C. Ballard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?