PRM KAUAI, LLC v. GIBSON
Plaintiff: PRM Kauai, LLC
Defendant: James Gibson and Bancentre Corp.
Case Number: 1:2014cv00164
Filed: April 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: DERRICK K. WATSON
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER ADOPTING 182 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 7/15/2016. - The Court recommends that Plaintiffs Objections be GRANTED, and that Defendants' request for costs be DENIED. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
May 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 164 ORDER GRANTING 141 MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING AS MOOT 130 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 5/18/2016. ~ The Court hereby GRANTS Pahio's Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' Motion for Summar y Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
December 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND/OR MODIFICATION OF THE COURT'S JULY 23, 2015 ORDER re: 95 . Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 12/23/2015. July 23, 2015 Order (docket entry no. [92 ]): ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PRM KAUAI, LLC v. GIBSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PRM Kauai, LLC
Represented By: David Dana Day
Represented By: William C. McCorriston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bancentre Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?