Cases 1 - 10 of 497
Thelma Williams, Jr. v. James Gibson, et al
as 24-2489
Defendant:
James, Law Library, VSM Unit, R. Barden, Major, VSM Unit, Dexter Payne, Director, ADC and others
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams, Jr.
Moody v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
LaKeithon Deon Moody
Defendant:
James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Wood v. James Gibson
as 24-2444
Defendant:
James Gibson, Warden, Varner Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wood
City of Chicago, et al v. Jeffrey I. Cummings
as 24-2094
Petitioner:
CITY OF CHICAGO, WILLIAM MOSER, JOHN E. BYRNE and others
Respondent:
JEFFREY I. CUMMINGS
Interested Party:
JAMES GIBSON
Thornsberry v. Perkins et al
as 4:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Thornsberry
Defendant:
Brian T Perkins, Roosevelt G Barden, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
James Gibson, Dexter Payne, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buford v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Defendant:
Anthony Jackson, James Gibson and Dexter Payne
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wood
Defendant:
James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
