Olsen v. Idaho State of

Olsen v. Idaho State of

Petitioner:	Vincent Craig Olsen
Respondent:	Idaho State of
Case Number:	1:2009cv00081
Filed:	April 20, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Mikel H. Williams
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 30, 2011	Filing 53 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 42 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
March 29, 2010	Filing 40 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 35 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting 37 Motion for Leave to File; granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss; granting 24 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting 31 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Claims 3,4,5,6,8,9,11,12,13,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30, and 31 are procedurally defaulted and subject to dismissal. Petitioner may proceed to the merits of Claims 1,2,7,10,14,15,20 , and 32. Respondent shall file an answer to the remaining claims no later than 5/28/2010 and a motion for summary judgment on the remaingin claims no later than 7/30/2010. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 30, 2011

Filing 53 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 42 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)

March 29, 2010

Filing 40 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 35 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting 37 Motion for Leave to File; granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss; granting 24 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting 31 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Claims 3,4,5,6,8,9,11,12,13,16,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30, and 31 are procedurally defaulted and subject to dismissal. Petitioner may proceed to the merits of Claims 1,2,7,10,14,15,20 , and 32. Respondent shall file an answer to the remaining claims no later than 5/28/2010 and a motion for summary judgment on the remaingin claims no later than 7/30/2010. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olsen v. Idaho State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Vincent Craig Olsen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Idaho State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?