District Court Cases in Idaho
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,804
Oravetz v. Vogel
as 2:2025cv00146
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Brian Vogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. Clallam County Sheriffs
as 2:2025cv00147
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Clallam County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. Gray Wolf Storage
as 2:2025cv00148
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Gray Wolf Storage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Oravetz v. Rista
as 2:2025cv00149
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Anothney Rista
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. All About Storage
as 2:2025cv00150
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
All About Storage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Oravetz v. Sequim Self Storage Units
as 2:2025cv00151
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Sequim Self Storage Units
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Oravetz v. Jefferson County Sheriffs
as 2:2025cv00152
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Alliant, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, v. Fluid Charge, LLC et al.,
as 1:2025cv00143
Defendant:
John McCoy, Fluid Charge, LLC, Leesburg Pike Partners, LLC (Maryland) and others
Plaintiff:
Alliant,LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Roberts et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2025cv00141
Plaintiff:
Casey Roberts and Deborah Roberts
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burning Glass International, Inc. v. Burning Glass Institute
as 3:2025cv00142
Plaintiff:
Burning Glass International, Inc.
Defendant:
Burning Glass Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
