Wicklund v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
| Mark Stephen Wicklund |
| Mark McCullough, Idaho Commision of Pardon and Parole, Heidi Hart, Melissa Mezo, Idaho Department of Corrections, Brandon Sutherland, State of Idaho, Sane Solutions, Terry Reilly Health Services, Ken Bennett, Moira Lynch and William C Young |
| 1:2009cv00674 |
| December 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Candy W Dale |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 52 Motion to Dismiss. Until the Ninth Circuit resolves the current appeals, no further pleadings will be entertained by this Court.. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dks)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 40 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion for Summary Judgment; All claims against State Defendants are dismissed except for the First Amendment claim as discussed in this Order against Defendant Bennett.. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
