Crandall v. Seagate Technology et al
||Daniel W Crandall
||Seagate Technology and Best Buy Co Inc
||March 9, 2010
||Idaho District Court
||Boise - Southern Office
||Larry M. Boyle
|Nature of Suit:
||Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 30, 2011
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 94 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 92 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
|January 25, 2011
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment (Dkt. 39 ), filed 8/17/10, is DENIED; Defendant Best Buy's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 47 ), filed 9/10/10, is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to F ile Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 51 ), filed 10/20/10, is DENIED; and Plaintiffs Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 59 ), filed 11/12/10, is DENIED. Signed by Judge Mikel H. Williams. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.