Leitter et al v. Armstrong
Alice Leitter, Christopher Boyle, Doris Anderson, Russell Anderson, Noreen Daines and Ellen Brower |
Richard Armstrong |
1:2010cv00361 |
July 16, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Boise - Southern Office |
Ada - Southern |
Candy W Dale |
Welfare |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER approving agreed plan and lifting TRO re 14 Order on Motion for TRO,. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks) |
Filing 29 ORDER on Motion to Lift Temporary Restraining Order denying 22 Motion to Lift Temporary Restraining Order. The restraining order shall remain in effect until IDHW has proposed, and the Court has approved, a checklist and interview procedure. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm) |
Filing 14 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, granting in part and denying in part 3 Motion for TRO. The restraining order shall remain in effect until Defendant has proposed, and the Court has approved, a plan for Defendant to provide meaningful notice to the individuals identified. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.