Filicetti v. State of Idaho et al
| Carol A Filicetti |
| State of Idaho, Idaho State Tax Commission and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2010cv00595 |
| December 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Candy W Dale |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER ADOPTING except as modified 71 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 66 Motion to Review Clerk's Action on Costs. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dmc)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 27 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff is directed submit a proposed Judgment within fourteen (14) days from the date of this decision and order.. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 7 Motion for Partial Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
