Horonzy v. Smith

Horonzy v. Smith

Petitioner:	John E Horonzy
Respondent:	Johanna Smith
Case Number:	1:2011cv00235
Filed:	May 20, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Ronald E Bush
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 16, 2013	Filing 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting Respondent's 8 MOTION for Summary Dismissal; granting 27 MOTION for Extension of Time to Lodge Transcript; considered timely 28 Notice; mooting Petitioner's 30 Objection; denying 30 -1 Petiti oner's Motion for Application of Martinez v. ryan to Excuse Procedural Default of Claims. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm) Modified on 7/17/2013 to add to text (cjm).
September 12, 2012	Filing 25 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER conditionally granting 8 Motion to Dismiss; granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; denying 19 Motion to Stay; Res to lodge Pretrial Record of the State Court ddl 11/11/12; Petitioner shall f ile a Motion for Application of Martinez v. Ryan to Excuse Procedural Default ddl 1/10/13. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (Copy emailed to Marilyn Paul, Twin Falls County Public Defender by dks) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dks)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 16, 2013

Filing 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting Respondent's 8 MOTION for Summary Dismissal; granting 27 MOTION for Extension of Time to Lodge Transcript; considered timely 28 Notice; mooting Petitioner's 30 Objection; denying 30 -1 Petiti oner's Motion for Application of Martinez v. ryan to Excuse Procedural Default of Claims. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm) Modified on 7/17/2013 to add to text (cjm).

September 12, 2012

Filing 25 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER conditionally granting 8 Motion to Dismiss; granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; denying 19 Motion to Stay; Res to lodge Pretrial Record of the State Court ddl 11/11/12; Petitioner shall f ile a Motion for Application of Martinez v. Ryan to Excuse Procedural Default ddl 1/10/13. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (Copy emailed to Marilyn Paul, Twin Falls County Public Defender by dks) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (dks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Horonzy v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: John E Horonzy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Johanna Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?