Nicholson v. Delgadillo et al
Brennan Nicholson |
Does I-X, Ruben Delgadillo and Mike Larimer |
1:2012cv00470 |
September 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Boise - Southern Office |
Ada - Southern |
Edward J. Lodge |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Nicholson's request for default judgment 36 is GRANTED. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Nicholson and against Delgadillo in the amount of $225,000 in compensatory damages and $675,000 in punitive damages, for a total damages award of $900,000. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 25 Defendant Larimer's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 28 Defendant Larimer's Motion to Strike. The Court dismisses claims against Defendant Does I-X. However, Nicholson has obtained an Order of Default against Defendant Delgadillo. As the amount of Nicholsons damages is not a sum certain, the Court would, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2),entertain a motion by Nicholson for entry of default judgment against Defendant Delgadillo. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.