Burch-Lucich v. Lucich et al
Plaintiff: Beau Burch-Lucich
Defendant: Gary L. Lucich, Marcae Lucich, Michelle Lucich Niece, Lucich Family Limited Partnership and Northwest Funding, LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv00218
Filed: May 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Boise - Southern Office
County: Canyon - Southern
Presiding Judge: Ronald E. Bush
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion for attorney fees and costs 66 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is granted to the extent plaintiffs seek $7,112.00 in attorney fees from defense counsel. It is denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion for partial summary judgment 48 is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
January 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the plaintiff's motion to compel 41 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that defendant's motion to compel 40 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff's motion 45 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
March 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 JOINT AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 19 Stipulation. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER.Completion of Discovery due by 4/30/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 7/30/2014. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
October 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendants' motion to dismiss this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Dkt. 6 ) is DENIED. Defendants' motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. 6 ) is DENIED at this time. The parties shall submit simu ltaneous briefs, not to exceed five pages, as to whether the trial discussed in this order should be a bench trial or a jury trial. These briefs shall be filed within 14 days after this order is signed. Discovery on the limited issue of whether an ar bitration agreement exists shall be completed within 60 days of date this order is signed. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. ADR Plan to be filed by 11/15/2013. Amended Pleadings due by 1/6/2014. Completion of Discovery due by 2/28/2014. Joinder of Parties due by 1/6/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 6/6/2014. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burch-Lucich v. Lucich et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beau Burch-Lucich
Represented By: Gabriel M. Haws
Represented By: Monte Neil Stewart
Represented By: Craig G. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary L. Lucich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcae Lucich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Lucich Niece
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lucich Family Limited Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northwest Funding, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?