Sorenson v. City of Caldwell et al
| Lynn Sorenson |
| City of Caldwell, City of Caldwell Department of Parks and Recreation and Kenneth Wheeler |
| 1:2014cv00221 |
| June 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Canyon - Southern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER - A 5-day Jury Trial set for 1/29/2018 01:30 PM in Boise - Courtroom 3 before Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 1/8/2018 04:00 PM in Boise Chambers before Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Rule 702 Motions due by 8/29/2017. Cas e Management deadline set for 11/20/2017 for the parties to notify the Court if the case has either settled or will definitely go to trial. Witness Lists, Exhibit Lists, Exhibits, Proposed Voir Dire, Proposed Jury Instructions, Trial Briefs, Motions in Limine due by 12/11/2017. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
33
JUDGMENT in favor of defendant. this case is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
