Davis v. Kootenai County Idaho et al
| Kevin M Davis |
| Kootenai County Idaho, Rocky Watson, Jason Shaw, Art Dollard, Dennis Stinebaugh, J Davis, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3 |
| 2:2008cv00250 |
| June 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Kootenai - Northern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Denying 86 MOTION to Retax Costs filed by Kevin M Davis, Granting 85 MOTION for Release of Funds Plaintiffs' Motion and Affidavit to Release Cash Bond filed by Kevin M Davis. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm) (cc: finance by jm)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying in part and finding as moot in part 48 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 52 Motion in Limine; denying in part and finding as moot in part 61 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
|
|
Filing
63
PRETRIAL ORDER Pretrial conference held 2/17/10. Trial set to begin 3/2/10. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
