Nuss v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. f/ka Gumtech International, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Doris A. Nuss
Defendant: Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. f/ka Gumtech International, Inc. and Zicam, LLC, f/k/a Gel Tech, LLC
Case Number: 2:2009cv00511
Filed: October 7, 2009
Court: Idaho District Court
Office: CDA - Northern Office
County: Bonner - Northern
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Lodge
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nuss v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. f/ka Gumtech International, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doris A. Nuss
Represented By: Craig K Vernon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. f/ka Gumtech International, Inc.
Represented By: Noah Grant Hillen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zicam, LLC, f/k/a Gel Tech, LLC
Represented By: Noah Grant Hillen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.