Greenfield v. City of Post Falls Municipality et al
| Christina J Greenfield |
| R Scot Haug, Post Falls Police Department, Collin Coles, Joel K Ryan, Jerry Mason, Eric Keck, Jim Hammond, Clayton R Larkin, City of Post Falls Municipality, Rodney L Gunderson, Mark Goodwin, Greg Mclean and Bernard William McHugh |
| 2:2013cv00437 |
| October 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| CDA - Northern Office |
| Kootenai - Northern |
| Candy W. Dale |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 35 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (Dkt. 37 ) is DENIED as MOOT; and Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. 1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 22 Motion to Disqualify Counsel; denying 31 Motion to Strike; and taking judicial notice of the pleadings filed in Kootenai County Case No. CV 2010-8209, which are attached to the Affidavit of Peter Erbland, Dkt. 30 . Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (klw) on 12/6/2013).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
