Western Watersheds Project v. Bureau of Land Management
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management
Case Number: 4:2008cv00435
Filed: October 14, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Environmental Matters Office
County: Custer - Eastern
Presiding Judge: B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 309 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY BRIEFING. The Motion to Stay (Docket No. 308 ) is GRANTED, and briefing is STAYED on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees and Litigation Costs (Docket No. 302 ) until January 20, 2020. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (alw)
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 296 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED, that the defendant's motion to reconsider ( 277 ) is GRANTED. The motion for leave to file supplemental complaint ( 275 ) is DENIED with the understanding that any new case filed with these cl aims will be assigned to this Court. The motion for order ( 276 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
September 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 265 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER The motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiff (docket 227 ) is GRANTED. The motions for summary judgment filed bydefendants and intervenors (docket nos. 241 , 246 & 248 ) are DENIED. the EA, FONSI, and Final G razing Decisions concerning the Jim Sage allotment, Cassia Creek allotment, Chokecherry allotment, and Almo Womack allotment are hereby REMANDED to the BLM for further action consistent with this decision. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 249 ORDER re 227 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 241 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment, 246 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment Partial (Phase II) 248 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff shall file its combined opposition to Federal De fendants and Defendant-Intervenors cross-motions for summary judgment and reply in support of its motion for summary judgment on or before 1/6/2014. Federal Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors shall file their respective replies in support of their cross-motions for summary judgment on or before 2/20/2014. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
March 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 221 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Second Phase of Litigation). Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)
September 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 213 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 175 Motion for Relief; denying 181 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 171 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 133 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 149 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 153 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 156 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
September 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 141 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 108 Motion for Reconsideration. The Public Lands Council, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, and the Idaho Cattle Association are allowed to intervene. Intervenors' briefs on the summary judgment motions due by 10/7/2011. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 89 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 55 Motion to Dismiss; granting 55 Motion to Sever; granting 55 Motion to Transfer Case; granting 59 Motion to Intervene; granting 62 Motion to file Amicus Brief ; denying 80 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 16 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by dks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Western Watersheds Project v. Bureau of Land Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project
Represented By: Kristin F. Ruether
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?