Hollist v. Madison County et al
| Pamela Hollist |
| Madison County and Roy Klingler |
| 4:2013cv00139 |
| March 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Jefferson - Eastern |
| B. Lynn Winmill |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that: Plaintiff Pamela Hollist's Motion 39 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff Pamela Hollist's Motion 34 is moot. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 25 is denied. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is granted as to the equal protection and freedom of association claims; and denied as to the due process claim. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 14 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
