Timothy v. Oneida County et al
Plaintiff: Heather S. Timothy
Defendant: Oneida County and Dustin W. Smith
Case Number: 4:2014cv00362
Filed: August 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Pocatello - Eastern Office
County: Oneida - Eastern
Presiding Judge: B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Oneida County and Dustin Smith's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 60 ) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 63 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. The motion is GRANTED to the extent the Court will treat the following fact as established: Smith read and considered Timothy's attorneys letters dated 2/7/2014 and 3/13/2014 (Dkts. 63-13 and 63-16) in deciding to terminate Timothy's employment. b. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
May 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Motion for a Protective Order (Dkt. 56 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as explained above. 2. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 41 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJ UDICE to refiling the motion at the conclusion of discovery. 3. Defendants Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 46 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling the motion at the conclusion of discovery. 4. Plaintiffs Motion for Continuance o f Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56(d) (Dkt. 51 ) is GRANTED.5. The parties Stipulated Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines (Dkt. 58 ) is GRANTED to the following extent: a. The discovery cutoff is extended from 4/8 /2016 through and including 7/8/2016. b. The dispositive-motion deadline is extended from 5/9/2016 through including 8/9/2016. (Discovery due by 7/8/2016. Dispositive Motions due by 8/9/2016.) Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
November 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Plaintiff Heather S. Timothys Motion to Reconsider (Dkt. 24 ) is DENIED. Defendants Oneida County, Dustin Smith, Shelle Daniels, Dale Tubbs, and Max Firths Motion for Partial Dismissal (Dkt. 28 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
July 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Quash Subpoena and Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 27 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants request to stay all discovery is denied, but the Defendants' request to quash Mr Castleton's subpoena is granted. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Defendants Motion for Partial Dismissal (Dkt. 13 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Timothy may file an amended complaint within 30 days of this Order. The parties' unopposed Motions for Leave to File Excess Pages (Dkts. 12 , 17 ) are GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 2 Motion to Waive. The Court finds an appropriate bond amount in this case is $5,000, to be secured and posted within 20 days of this Order. Alternatively, Timothy may file a motion to waive the bond requ irement within 20 days of the date of this Order along with the requisite financial affidavits and the Court will determine if the indigency requirements for a waiver have been established. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)(Emailed to hg, jd, an jt in Finance.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Timothy v. Oneida County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather S. Timothy
Represented By: Richard A Hearn
Represented By: Stephen J Muhonen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oneida County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dustin W. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?