Smith v. Thomas et al
| Seneca Smith |
| Russell, Godinez and Jones |
| 1:2011cv00189 |
| January 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Elaine E. Bucklo |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order, Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 10/31/2012.(ea, )
|
|
Filing
4
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 1/26/2011:Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The court authorizes the trust fund officer at Plaintiffs place of confinement to deduct $59.20 from Plaintiffs account, and to continue making deductions in accordance with this order. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Stateville Correctional Center. The clerk is directed to issue summonses for Defendants Salvad or Godinez and Cook County Jail Division 9 Officers Jones and Russell. The U.S. Marshals Service is appointed to serve these Defendants. The other Defendants are dismissed. The clerk shall send to Plaintiff a magistrate judge consent form and filing instructions along with a copy of this order. Status hearing set for 4/8/11 at 9:30 a.m. [For further details see written opinion.]Mailed notice(lw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
