Cases 1 - 10 of 74,616
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Heather Patton, Jefferey Wayne Phillips, Carol Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Reider et al
as 2:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Mayor David Reider, Chief of Police Jeff Ross, Sergeant Jonia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Shook et al
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Captain Jacob Shook, Lieutenant Samantha Smith, Emily Hanuska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
LANDOLFI v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv05908
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LANDOLFI
Defendant:
RENE JONES and M&T BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65453
Plaintiff:
Nicole M. Jones
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Thaggard v. Treeline Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thaggard
Defendant:
Treeline Services, LLC, Anthony Jones, Michael Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Jones v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Joseph Davis, Gabriel Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Mack Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
