Cases 1 - 10 of 705
Preston (PS) et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2025cv00053
Defendant:
Linda Jones, Keri McCabe and Nate Thompson
Plaintiff:
Keola Slater and James Allen Preston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (PS) v. United States Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, The et al
as 1:2024cv03593
Defendant:
District Court for the District of Colorado, Ronald M. Mullins, Raymond P. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv03556
Plaintiff:
Ray Jones
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson (PS) v. Jones
as 1:2024cv03469
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jackson
Defendant:
Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 - Americans With Disabilities Act - Employment
Jones (PS) v. USA - Federal Bureau of Prison
as 1:2024cv03281
Defendant:
USA - Federal Bureau of Prison
Plaintiff:
Prince Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard (PS) v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024cv03059
Defendant:
Mick Bunn, Darin Little, Mia Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Ballard and Jacqueline-Sue Ballard
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ballard (PS) v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024cv02926
Defendant:
Cody Prentice, Travis Peck, Sarah Handcock and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Elizabeth Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra - Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Davis (PS) v. Lepe
as 1:2024cv02882
Defendant:
Lepe, FCI Florence Special Housing Officers, Sandoval and others
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Zdenek Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
