WARDROP v. ELAN MOTORSPORTS TECHNOLOGIES RACING CORP
1:2004cv00104 |
January 20, 2004 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 262 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 256 Motion for Reconsideration- The Court grants defts motion for partial reconsideration on second motion for s/j, but denies defts request for oral argument. Deft is granted s/j as to pltfs claim for commissions. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 11/20/2012. (CBU) |
Filing 251 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 232 Motion for Summary Judgment-Specifically, Deft is granted s/j as to pltfs claims based upon the Share Option Term and denied s/j as to all other claims; denying 234 Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety; denying 239 and 243 Motion for oral argument on s/j motions. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 7/24/2012. (CBU) |
Filing 186 ORDER granting 176 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or Enter Judgment. For the reasons discussed herein, Wardrop's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment shall enter accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 1/21/2010. (LBK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WARDROP v. ELAN MOTORSPORTS TECHNOLOGIES RACING CORP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.