FINCH et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
JOSEPH W. FINCH, DAVID E. HENSLEY and PETER W. MUNGOVAN |
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, BARTON R. PETERSON, MONROE GRAY, JR., FRANK J. ANDERSON, MICHAEL T. SPEARS, MERIT BOARD FOR THE METROPOLITAN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, CORDELIA L. BURKS, MARY MAXWELL and JOSEPH L. SMITH, JR. |
1:2008cv00432 |
April 2, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Marion |
Richard L. Young |
William T. Lawrence |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 172 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 148 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 159 Motion for Summary Judgment. (See Order for details.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 8/10/2012. (TMA) |
Filing 133 ORDER denying 114 Motion to Compel; granting 128 Motion for Leave to File. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 6/23/2011. (LH) |
Filing 76 ORDER DENYING 56 plaintiffs' motion to treat the motion for judgment on the pleadings as a motion for summary judgment and DENYING 51 defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The stay of this case entered on May 13, 2009 is lifted. Counsel are ordered to confer and file a proposed Revised Case Management Plan on or before July 8, 2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 6/24/2009. (WJC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.