WELDON v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC et al
| KEVIN M. WELDON |
| ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC and BOWMAN, HEINTZ, BOSCIA & VICIAN, P.C. |
| 1:2010cv00660 |
| May 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Larry J. McKinney |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER - For the reasons detailed herein, Defendants' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment [Dkt. 36.] is DENIED. Mr. Weldon's Motion to Strike [Dkt. 38.] is DENIED to the extent he seeks to strike Defendants' entire motion and GRANTED to the extent he seeks to strike the exhibits Defendants filed with their motion. Defendants are ordered to answer Mr. Weldon's Complaint by June 8, 2011. See Order. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/19/2011. (LBK)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying 16 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons detailed herein, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. [Dkt. 16.] The Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not apply, res judicata does not bar Mr. Weldon's federal claim, and the Court cannot determine whether the statute of limitations bars Mr. Weldon's claim at this time. Discovery may provide further insight on this and other issues. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/14/2011. (LBK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
