THATCHER et al v. PERKINS, VAN NATTA, SANDOVE and KELLY, MERDIAN PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.C.
| CARLY PLAYFORD, BROOKE SNODGRASS and PATRICIA THATCHER |
| PERKINS, VAN NATTA, SANDOVE and KELLY, MERDIAN PLASTIC SURGERY CENTER, P.C. |
| 1:2010cv01115 |
| September 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER granting 45 48 and 51 Motions for Summary Judgment and hereby DISMISSES with prej Count I and II of pltfs Amended Complt, and DISMISSES without prej Counts III, IV, V, VI and VII of pltfs Amended Complt. The final ptc set for 7/24/2013 and the jury trial set for 8/12/2013 are vacated. Within 7 days parties shall confer and submit a proposed final judgment regarding disposition and remand. Further, the pending motions 68 83 86 and 97 are DENIED as moot. The Court grants 103 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance of Attorney Robert W. York on behalf of Carly Miller Playford. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/28/2013. (CBU)
|
|
Filing
76
ENTRY on Motion for Reconsideration - Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider (Dkt. 74 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/7/2012. (TRG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
