DRAPER, INC. v. MECHOSHADE SYSTEMS, INC. et al
| DRAPER, INC. |
| JOEL BERMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. and MECHOSHADE SYSTEMS, INC. |
| 1:2010cv01443 |
| November 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER denying 96 Plaintiff's Bill of Costs and 97 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/30/2013. (PGS)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Draper's 64 Motion to Compel. It is time to determine whether the Court has personal jurisdiction over MechoShade. MechoShade shall complete the productions ordered herein no later than February 24 , 2012. It shall make rolling productions as documents and summaries become ready to produce. Draper shall file its response to MechoShades Motion to Dismiss no later than March 14, 2012. MechoShade may file a reply no later than March 24, 2012. The parties should not expect to receive extensions of these deadlines (S.O.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 1/30/2012. (MAC)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting Pltf's 31 Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 3/31/2011. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
