ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION v. MEDICAL AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, INC. et al
| ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION |
| MEDICAL AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, INC., GREGORY A. MENKE and KURT M. WASSENAAR |
| 1:2010cv01718 |
| December 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court's ruling is STAYED until Friday, February 25, 2011, at 5:00 p.m. EST to permit either party to pursue an appeal. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/23/2011. (PGS)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER granting 44 Motion for Leave to File Surreply; granting 58 Motion to Seal; and granting 25 Motion for TRO. SCHEDULING ORDER: Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 2/14/2011 at 09:30 AM in room #349 (Judge Young's Courtroom) of the United States Courthouse at 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Judge Sarah Evans Barker. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/28/2011.(PGS)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion for Expedited Discovery. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 1/14/2011. (LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
