CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS, INC. et al v. LAHOOD et al
ANN M. BAAS, LYNNE BERGH, JANICE ANN BOYD, WILLIAM A. BOYD, DARRELL BREEDEN, CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS, INC., RUTH ANN FLYNN, WILLIAM SCOTT FLYNN, JERRY JOCHIM, KENDA JOCHIM, THOMAS JOCHIM, ANDREW JOHN KNOTT, MICHAEL KNOTT, CHARLOTTE ANN PAUL, H. WAYNE SULLIVAN, THE I-69 ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, SANDRA TOKARSKI, THOMAS TOKARSKI and CORA E. YOUNG |
MICHAEL B. CLINE, RAY LAHOOD, VICTOR MENDEZ and ROBERT F. TALLY |
1:2011cv01031 |
August 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Environmental Matters |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 182 CORRECTED ORDER re 172 Closed Judgment AND 171 Order on Motion - Defendants motions for summary judgment are GRANTED on all remaining counts of the Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs partial motion for summary judgment and Plaintiffs second motion for preliminary injunction are accordingly DENIED. The Court will enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/14/2015.(CBU) |
Filing 173 ORDER ON DEFENDANT INDOT'S 151 MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/4/2014. (JD) |
Filing 171 ORDER - Defendants' motions for summary judgment [Dkt. 160 and 162 ] are GRANTED on all remaining counts of the Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs' partial motion for summary judgment and Plaintiffs' second motion for preliminary injunction [Dkt. 141 and 142 ] are accordingly DENIED. The Court will enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/31/2014. (JD) |
Filing 150 ORDER - denying 136 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(b). *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/25/2013. (CKM) |
Filing 132 ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction 36 WITHOUT PREJUDICE and DENIES AS MOOT Federal Defendants' Motion to Strike and Motion in Limine 59 . The Court also GRANTS Federal Defendants 39; Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 62 WITH PREJUDICE. Accordingly, Counts III, IV, V, VI, and VIII of the Amended Complaint are dismissed with prejudice and may not be refiled in a subsequent pleading. (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/19/2012. (MAC) |
Filing 94 The motions to quash (Dkts. 67, 69, 75, 81, 83, 85, 91) are therefore GRANTED. The magistrate judge will assist the parties to develop a discovery plan that is appropriately targeted to the relevant issues for a preliminary injunction hearing and tha t can be conducted in a timely fashion. The court sets this matter for a telephone conference on February 14, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern). Counsel for all parties, including counsel for employees of BLA and Dawn M. Replogle, are to participate in this conference. The court will contact counsel by separate email with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 2/10/2012. (LH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.