GLASCO v. CASE MANAGER HINSHAW et al
| CONZALOS GLASCO |
| NURSE TAFOYA, OFFICER REEVE, SGT. KRULL, SGT. MATLOCK and CASE MANAGER HINSHAW |
| 1:2011cv01043 |
| August 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
Entry Granting Nurse Tafoya's Motion for Summary Judgment - Nurse Tafoya's motion for summary judgment [dkt. 55 ] is GRANTED. This Entry along with the Entry of March 19, 2013, resolves all claims against all parties. All defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Judgment consistent with these Entries shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/7/2013. Copy Mailed. (JD) Modified document type on 10/8/2013 (JD).
|
|
Filing
43
ENTRY Granting Motion for Summary Judgment - The Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Dkt. 31 ] is GRANTED. This Entry does not resolve the claim alleged against defendant Nurse Tafoya. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/19/2013. (Copy mailed) (TRG) Modified on 3/19/2013 to reflect copy mailed (TRG).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
