JARRETT v. WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
Plaintiff: COLEMAN JARRETT
Defendant: WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP INC. and WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00064
Filed: January 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER - This cause is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 84] filed by Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. ("Wright Medical"). Plaintiffs Coleman and Paula Jarrett commenced this action in 2012 and it was tran sferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia as part of a multi-district litigation styled "CONSERVE Hip Implant Product Liability Litigation, MDL 2329" ("the MDL"). This case was remanded and transferred to our court to proceed individually on July 6, 2018. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Dkt. 84 is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' manufacturing defect, failure-to-warn, and fraud theories under the IPLA as well as Plaint iffs' punitive damages request and DENIED as to Plaintiffs' IPLA claim based on a design defect theory and the loss of consortium claim. The case will proceed accordingly. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/22/2021. *** SEE ORDER *** (CKM)
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY - For the reasons detailed above, Defendant's Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of John I. Waldrop, M.D. [Dkt. 80 ] and Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of John D. Jarrell, Ph.D., PE [Dkt. 81 ] are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth in this Entry. Defendant's pending motion for summary judgment shall be addressed in due course. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/26/2021. (NAD)
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER re 34 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike - Wright Medical's Partial Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART: Count II (Granted), Count III (Granted), Count IV (Granted), Count V (Denied), Count VI (Denied), Attorney Fees (Granted), Prejudgment Interest (Granted). Count I survives as it was not the subject of the motions considered here. ***SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS.*** Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/21/2019. (LDH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JARRETT v. WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: COLEMAN JARRETT
Represented By: Eric Charles Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?