SCHOTT v. THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK

Plaintiff: ROXANNA SCHOTT
Defendant: THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
Case Number: 1:2012cv00430
Filed: April 3, 2012
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Denise K. LaRue
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 27, 2012 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 15 Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/27/2012. (PGS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCHOTT v. THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROXANNA SCHOTT
Represented By: Ryan S. McCrosson
Represented By: MCCROSSON & ASSOCIATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
Represented By: Nelson D. Alexander
Represented By: Lucy Renee Dollens
Represented By: Michael A. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.