JONES v. METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF DECATUR TOWNSHIP et al
| KEITH JONES |
| JOHN BAILEY, BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS, METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF DECATUR TOWNSHIP, SUSAN ADAMS, JEFFREY BAER and DONALD STINSON |
| 1:2012cv00650 |
| May 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, 18 , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. As discussed above, the Motion is denied only as to Mr. Jones' ADEA retaliation claim against MSD relating to MSD's placement of the Baer Letter in Mr. Jones' personnel file. That claim will proceed. All other claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants' Motion for Sanctions, 23 , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Counsel are ORDERED to confer with the Magistrate Judge to try to reach an agreement regarding a reasonable amount of attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses that Defendants incurred and for which Mr. Jones and his counsel should be responsible based on the foregoing Order. If they cannot reach an agreement, the Magistrate Judge may set an appropriate briefing schedule ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/26/2012. (DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
