FALL v. NAPOLITANO et al
| DIOR FALL |
| KAMSING V. LEE and HON. JANET NAPOLITANO |
| 1:2012cv01231 |
| August 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 10 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. [Dkt. 10 .] Judgment in favor of the Defendants will enter accordingly. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/9/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER To File Joint Jurisidictional Statement - The Court ORDERS the parties to conduct whatever research is necessary and file a joint jurisdictional statement by April 30, 2013, specifically setting forth any basis for this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. If the parties cannot agree on the contents of a joint statement, competing statements shall be filed by that date. The parties should keep in mind that because this Court rarely adjudicates immigration appeals, familiarity with terminology typically used in that practice area should not be presumed. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/15/2013. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
