OSBORN v. ASTRUE
GERALDINE OSBORN |
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE |
SSA (Court Use Only) |
1:2012cv01375 |
September 25, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ENTRY REVIEWING THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION: The standard for disability claims under the Social Security Act is stringent. "Even claimants with substantial impairments are not necessarily entitled to benefits, which are paid for by tax es, including taxes paid by those who work despite serious physical or mental impairments and for whom working is difficult and painful." Williams-Overstreet v. Astrue, 364 Fed. Appx. 271, 274 (7th Cir. 2010). Furthermore, the standard of review of the Commissioner's denial of benefits is narrow. Id. Taken together, the Court can find no legal basis presented by Ms. Osborn to overturn the Commissioner's decision that Ms. Osborn is not disabled. Therefore, the decision below is AFFIRMED. Final judgment will be entered accordingly ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/18/2013.(DW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.