DUCKER v. AMIN et al
| STACEY DUCKER |
| BHAVNA AMIN and DEVANG AMIN |
| 1:2012cv01596 |
| October 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER - Both of Plaintiff's claims rest on logical ground that is ultimately too weak to support them: the contention that Amin's email--which revealed about her only the possibility that she might be a female--identified her to a suf ficient degree to be actionable on any theory. This deficiency is fatal to both claims, and Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Dkt. 40 ] is therefore GRANTED as to both claims, and judgment will enter accordingly. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/14/2014. (JD)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER on 46 Motion for Protective Order - Ms. Ducker's motion for protective order (Dkt. 46) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. The common interest privilege protects from disclosure only communications between Ms. Ducker and Mr. Worthy that included one or both of their legal counsel, or included only their legal counsel, and which concerned their common interest. It does not protect from disclosure communications between Ms. Ducker and Mr. Worthy without the participation of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 12/31/2013. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
