THARP et al v. CATRON INTERIOR SYSTEMS, INC
| JOE COAR, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, DOUGLAS J. MCCARRON, WILLIAM NIX, DOUG ROBINSON and DAVID THARP |
| CATRON INTERIOR SYSTEMS, INC |
| 1:2012cv01870 |
| December 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
ORDER - 107 Motion for Attorney Fees is granted. The Plaintiffs are awarded their attorney fees in the amount of $54,062.50 and their costs in the amount of $650.55, for a total award of $54,713.05 against Defendant Catron Interior Systems, Inc. See order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/12/2018. (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
106
CLOSED JUDGMENT in favor of the Plaintiffs for an award of $122,042.98. Judgment is entered accordingly, and this action is TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/23/2017.(CBU)
|
|
Filing
86
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION TO STRIKE SURREPLY - For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 78 ) is set for hearing on Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., at the Birch Bayh Fede ral Building and U.S. Courthouse, 46 East Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, Courtroom #344. Catron is granted leave to amend its Answer within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Entry to assert a counterclaim for setoff based on the market recovery fund grants, and the Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Catron's Surreply Brief is denied. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/12/2016.(JLS)
|
|
Filing
74
ENTRY FOLLOWING DAMAGES HEARING - Catron is liable to the Plaintiffs for delinquent Union dues, contributions, deductions, interest, and liquidated damages in the amount of $6,399.48 and for delinquent contributions, interest, liquidated dama ges, and auditor fees in the amount of $111,340.67 for the period of January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, totaling $117,740.15. This amount of liability is offset by the amount owed to Catron under the market recovery fund grants, totaling $95,367.50. Therefore, Catron's total liability to the Plaintiffs for the period of January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012 is $22,372.65. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2), the Plaintiffs also are entitled to their reasonable attorney's fees and costs of this action. If these fees and costs are sought, the Plaintiffs must file an accounting of the fees and costs within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Final judgment will issue under separate order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/3/2016.(JLS)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER denying 55 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/19/2015. (CBU)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 38 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/15/2014. (CBU)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying Catron's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. It is hereby ordered that Catron grant plaintiffs' payroll auditor access to all records necessary to complete the audit. Within 30 days of the completed audit, the parties are ORDERED to file a status report with the Court containing the results of the audit. If necessary, the Court will address any delinquent contributions or deductions, fees, and costs within a reasonable time. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/10/2014. (CBU)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
