WELTON v. ANDERSON et al
MARSHALL G. WELTON |
SHANI J. ANDERSON, GEORGE E. KEELY and THE NATIONAL BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS CORPORATION |
1:2013cv00355 |
March 4, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 CLOSED JUDGMENT: Consistent with the Court's Order entered this date, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this matter. Plaintiff Marshall G. Welton's claims against Defendant Shani J. Anderson are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE such that Plaintiff shall take nothing by way of his Complaint against Defendant Anderson. Mr. Welton's claims against Defendants The National Bank of Indianapolis Corporation and George E. Keely are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/19/2013.(SWM) |
Filing 21 ORDER granting Defts The National Bank of Indianapolis and George E. Keely's 11 Motion for More Definite Statement. Pltf shall file an Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order that alleges which claims are being asserted against which Defendants. The failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of the claims against Defendants NBI and Keely (see Order for additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/21/2013. (SWM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.