TRANSPOINT, LLC v. OXBRIDGE VENTURES, INC. et al
| TRANSPOINT, LLC |
| CAPITAL FUNDING OF AMERICA, INC., OXBRIDGE VENTURES, INC. and KARIM RAJANI |
| 1:2013cv00436 |
| March 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER TO FILE JOINT JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT: The Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer, and conduct whatever investigation necessary, to determine whether this Court has diversity jurisdiction. If the parties agree that diversity jurisdiction is proper, they shall file a joint jurisdictional statement by April 5, 2013 setting forth the parties' citizenships and the amount in controversy. Specifically, the parties shall set forth the names and citizenships of each of Transport's members, traced through every layer of membership or partnership. If the parties cannot agree on their citizenships or the amount in controversy, they are ordered to file competing jurisdictional statements by April 5, 2013 setting forth their positions. The joint jurisdictional statement, or competing jurisdictional statement, shall satisfy Plaintiff's obligations under Local Rule 81-1 ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/26/2013.(DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
