MANTEL v. BOREN
||LINDA SUE BOREN
||April 26, 2013
||Indiana Southern District Court
||Tim A. Baker
||Tanya Walton Pratt
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 1, 2014
ENTRY and ORDER denying Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Default Judgment. Mr. Mantel is notified of the absence of jurisdiction in this Court and shall have through June 3, 2014, in which to file an amended complaint curing this deficiency or to otherwise show cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/1/2014. (MAC)
|October 6, 2014
ENTRY ON DAMAGES - This matter was before the Court on a damages hearing held August, 27, 2014, on Plaintiff Charlie Mantel's ("Mr. Mantel") default judgment entered against Defendant Linda Sue Boren ("Ms. Boren"). Ms. Bo ren has failed to appear. The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. See In re Catt, 368 F.3d 789, 793 (7th Cir. 2004) ("Even when a default judgment is warranted based on a party's failure to defend, the all egations in the complaint with respect to the amount of the damages are not deemed true. The district court must instead conduct an inquiry in order to ascertain the amount of damages with reasonable certainty."). Mr. Mantel is awarded $81,000 in damages. Further, Ms. Boren is enjoined from engaging in the defamatory conduct described herein. Copy Mailed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/6/2014.(MGG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.