ACF 2006 CORP v. CONOUR et al
Plaintiff: |
ACF 2006 CORP |
Defendant: |
COHEN & MALAD, LLP, WILLIAM F. CONOUR, CONOUR LAW FIRM, LLC, TIMOTHY F. DEVEREUX, JEFFREY A. HAMMOND and MARK C. LADENDORF ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C. |
Case Number: |
1:2013cv01286 |
Filed: |
August 13, 2013 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Office: |
Indianapolis Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Presiding Judge: |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Nature of Suit: |
Negotiable Instrument |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
January 24, 2017 |
Filing
191
ORDER denying 187 Motion to Amend/Alter Final Judgment. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/24/2017. (CBU)
|
September 19, 2016 |
Filing
185
ENTRY FOLLOWING MANDATE FROM THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS - For the reasons set forth in the Mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit entered on August 1, 2016: The Court enters Final Judgment against Plaintiff , ACF 2006 Corp. and directs that ACF 2006 Corp. take nothing by its claims asserted in this action. The Court enters Final Judgment in favor of Intervenors, David L. Beals, Sr., Loretta Beals, and Kristen Beals, by her Guardians David L. Beals, S r. and Loretta Beals, in the amount of $358,069.83. The Court orders appellate costs to be assessed against ACF 2006 Corp. in the amount of $500.00 payable to the Beals Intervenors, and an additional $500.00 payable to Ladendorf / Deve reux for costs assessed by the Court of Appeals. Judgment is entered against ACF 2006 Corp. in those amounts. The quantum meruit claim associated with the N.E. case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as unripe. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/19/2016.(JLS)
|
August 25, 2015 |
Filing
151
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL MARCH 9-10, 2015. For the reasons set forth in the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Court finds that, based upon the quantum meruit division of the attorney' ;s fees and expenses in the Subject Cases, ACF is entitled to a judgment in the amount of $774,797.28, which constitutes the amount of fees and expenses to which the Conour Firm would have been entitled to under Indiana law. Final judgment shall issue in an order separate from this Entry. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/25/2015.(MAC)
|
June 12, 2015 |
Filing
149
ENTRY - STRIKING STIPULATION; The parties failed to provide the Court with the requested position statements regarding whether Keller & Keller and the Nunn Firm must be added as indispensable parties under Rule 19, and because the stipulation w as filed in violation of Local Rule 83-7(a), the Court hereby STRIKES the parties' stipulation. As stated in the Court's original entry requesting additional briefing, the parties of record are hereby ORDERED to each file a position statement. The parties' supplemental briefs are due within ten (10) days of the date of this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/12/2015.(CKM)
|
February 24, 2015 |
Filing
134
ENTRY on Motion to Reconsider - Intervenors have not demonstrated that the Court committed a manifest error of law in finding that their interests are subordinate to the perfected security interest held by ACF with respect to the property at issue in this action. Therefore, Intervenors' Motion to Reconsider (Filing No. 121 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/24/2015. (TRG)
|
January 30, 2015 |
Filing
119
ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Mr. Devereux's and the Ladendorf Firm's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 63 ) is GRANTED. ACF's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 59 ) is DENIED in part with respect to the claims against Mr. Devereux and the Ladendorf Firm, and GRANTED in part with respect to Mr. Conour, the Conour Firm, the Intervenors, Mr. Hammond, and Cohen & Malad. The Intervenors' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. [ 70]) is DENIED and their Complaint (Filing No. 55 ) is DISMISSED. The Intervenors' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Filing No. 88 ) is also DENIED. Recognizing that the parties have filed their final witness and exhibit list, (Filing No. 107, Filing No. 113 ) the parties have until February 6, 2015 to make any amendments to their lists. The final pretrial conference will be held as scheduled on February 11, 2015. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/30/2015. (MGG)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?