ANTON REALTY, LLC v. GUARDIAN BROKERS LTD., INC.
| ANTON REALTY, LLC |
| GUARDIAN BROKERS LTD., INC. |
| 1:2013cv01915 |
| December 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
ORDER. Plaintiffs-Counter Defendants Anton Realty, LLC, and Andy Mohr Truck Center, Inc. (col-lectively "Anton Realty") ask the Court to reconsider the Court's July 1, 2015, Order granting summary judgment to Defendant-Counter Claim ant Guardian Brokers, Ltd., Inc. ("Guardian Bro-kers") as to liability on all of both parties' claims. Anton Realty's Motion for Reconsideration improperly contains arguments not raised in its summary judgment briefing and othe rwise ignores the standard of review for such a motion. Furthermore, the result reached in the Court's Order and the path to get there were in large part dictated by how Anton Realty choose to argue its case -- choices it cannot attempt to undo now. For these reasons, which are explained in more detail below, Anton Realty's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. [Filing No. 154]. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/14/2015. (BGT)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER. Guardian Brokers' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, [Filing No. 106], Anton Realty's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, [Filing No. 133], and Anton Realty's Motion for Oral Argument is DENIED, [Filing No. 141]. The determination of the damages award for Guardian Brokers' breach of lease claim remains unresolved. Also, Anton Realty's claims against Defendant National Bank of Commerce, NA remain pending, though given the resolution of the owner ship issue may be moot. The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge attempt to resolve the remaining issues with the parties or, in the alternative, to establish a schedule to bring the case to conclusion. No partial final judgment shall enter at this time. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/1/2015. (BGT)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 145 Motion to Reopen Discovery (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 6/11/2015. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER overruling Plaintiffs' 117 Objection to Magistrate's Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to File a Fourth Amended Complaint. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/12/2015. (BGT)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER: For these reasons, the Court STRIKES the parties' Joint Jurisdictional Statement at Filing No. 112. The parties are ORDERED to conduct whatever investigation is necessary to file a joint jurisdictional statement by February 23, 2015, correcting the deficiencies identified herein and with which all parties can agree. If the parties cannot agree on the contents of a joint jurisdictional statement after diligent inquiry and effort, they are ordered to file competing statements by that date ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/9/2015.(DW)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER. For the reasons set out in this Order, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint jurisdictional statement by February 6, 2015, properly detailing the citizenship of each party and whether the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, along the lines set forth in this Order. If the parties cannot agree on the contents of a joint statement, competing statements must be filed by that date. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/29/2015. (BGT)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER REGARDING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT: For these reasons, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file a Third Amended Complaint, properly alleging a basis for this Court's diversity jurisdiction. The Court therefore DENIES those motions AS MOOT wi thout prejudice. [Filing No. 53; Filing No. 55.] Consequently, Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to respond to summary judgment, [Filing No. 81], is also DENIED AS MOOT. Guardian should not refile any further dispositive motion until National Bank has appeared ***SEE ORDER OFR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/13/2014. (DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ANTON REALTY, LLC v. GUARDIAN BROKERS LTD., INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANTON REALTY, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Michael Hurley |
| Represented By: | Kathryn E. Olivier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GUARDIAN BROKERS LTD., INC. | |
| Represented By: | Andrew W. Hull |
| Represented By: | Sean T. White |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
