CREECH v. COLVIN
CHARLES A. CREECH |
CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
SSA (Court Use Only) |
1:2014cv00319 |
March 4, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Denise K. LaRue |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 **PLEASE DISREGARD, DOCKTED IN ERROR**ENTRY - The Commissioner of Social Security denied Sara L. Mitcham's claim for disabilityinsurance benefits under the Social Security Act. Ms. Mitcham brought this suit for judicial review of that denial. Briefing is now complete and the matter is ready for decision. Ms. Mitcham has not shown that the Commissioner's denial of her claim is unsupported by substantial evidence or is the result of legal error, will issue affirming the Commissioner's decision. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 3/25/2015.(MGG) Modified on 3/25/2015 (MGG). |
Filing 19 ORDER - ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 18 Report and Recommendations; The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Complaint for Judicial Review. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/15/2015.(CKM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.