ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH et al v. POLYMER TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
| ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC. and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH |
| POLYMER TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. |
| 1:2014cv00552 |
| April 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER denying WITHOUT PREJUDICE 46 Roche's Motion to Seal Document - Because Roche has not explained why the documents at issue need to be kept under seal - other than stating that they discuss or constitute documents marked "Confide ntial" or "Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only" pursuant to the Protective Order - the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Motion for Leave to File Memorandum In Support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Certain Exhib its in the Supporting Appendix of Exhibits Under Seal. In light of Roche's concern, however, the Court will temporarily restrict access to Roche's Memorandum in support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction, [Filing No. 45; Filing No . 48-1], and certain exhibits filed under seal, [Filing No. 44], by DIRECTING THE CLERK TO MAINTAIN THOSE FILINGS UNDER SEAL until further order of the Court. To the extent Roche wishes to file a more substantive motion, it must do so by June 26, 2014. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/19/2014. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
