NGUYEN v. ENDOCYTE, INC. et al
TONY NGUYEN |
P. RON ELLIS and ENDOCYTE, INC. |
1:2014cv01048 |
June 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Securities/Commodities |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS - The Court DISMISSES without prejudice the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Filing No. 107). The Plaintiff is allowed up to Monday, February 1, 2016 to demonstrate sufficient facts exist to justify an amended pleading, consistent with this Order. If the Plaintiff does not present such facts by that time, dismissal will be changed to with prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/4/2016. (JLS) |
Filing 70 Movant's Ho Wing Sit (Filing No. 13 ), Endocyte Investors Group (Filing No. 25 ), and Vijay Vuyyuru (Filing No. 28 ) Motions are DENIED and Mr. Vallabhaneni's Motion (Filing No. 33 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk is Ordered to consolidate Case No. 1:14-cv-01162-TWP-MJD with and under Case No. 1:14-cv-01048-TWP-MJD. The Clerk shall administratively close Case No. 1:14-cv- 01162-TWP-MJD. All future filings shall be made in Case No. 1:14-cv- 01048-TWP- MJD and the caption shall read: Gopichand Vallabhaneni, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, plaintiff vs. Endocyte, Inc. and P. Ron Ellis, Defendants. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/22/2014. (MGG) Modified on 9/23/2014 (MGG). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.