BRIGGS v. USA
Petitioner: JUSTIN ALLEN BRIGGS
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2014cv01111
Filed: July 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 19 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (USCA #16-1810). Accordingly, his appeal is not taken in good faith, and his request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [dkt 19] is denied. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/10/2016. (JLS)
March 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Entry Discussing Treatment of Motion to Amend Judgment - Because the first step in such a situation is a procedural one, the clerk shall process the motion as a new civil action in the Indianapolis Division. The motion shall be the initial pleadin g in the newly opened action and shall be re-docketed there as the motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. A copy of this Entry shall likewise be docketed in the new action. The new action shall have a NOS of 510 and a cause of action code of 28:2255. In the new action, Justin Allen Briggs shall be the petitioner and the United States shall be the respondent. The motion (Dkt. 11] as filed in this action is DENIED. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/16/2016. (JLS)
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Entry Denying Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment - There was no manifest error of law or fact in this case. The Court did not misapprehend the petitioner's claims, nor did it misapply the law to those claims in finding that dismissal was required. Accordingly, the motion to alter or amend judgment [dkt. 9] is denied. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/11/2016. (JLS)
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Entry Discussing Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying Certificate of Appealability - The Court has considered Briggs' motion, the United States' response, Briggs' reply, and the underlying record, and bein g duly advised, finds that Briggs' motion for relief must be DENIED. A copy of this Entry shall be docketed in the underlying criminal action, Case No. 1:13-cr-00059-TWP-MJD. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/11/2016.(JLS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRIGGS v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JUSTIN ALLEN BRIGGS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?