GAULDEN v. USA

GAULDEN v. USA

Petitioner:	LYNDA GAULDEN
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2014cv01497
Filed:	September 12, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 5, 2016	Filing 11 ENTRY AND NOTICE - The Motion for Attorney Representaion [Dkt. 9] is DENIED. The reasons for this ruling are that the action is closed, no substantive post-judgment motion is pending, no claim was left unresolved when final judgment was docketed, and the motion fails to identify any proceeding in which the defendant would require representation. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/5/2016. (JLS) Modified on 7/5/2016 (JLS).
December 9, 2015	Filing 7 ENTRY Discussing Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying Certificate of Appealability - Gaulden's motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and the underlying record fail to show that her conviction has be en entered in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States. That motion [dkt. 1] is therefore denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. The court finds that Gaulden has failed to show that reasonable jurists woul d find it "debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/09/2015.(JLS)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 5, 2016

Filing 11 ENTRY AND NOTICE - The Motion for Attorney Representaion [Dkt. 9] is DENIED. The reasons for this ruling are that the action is closed, no substantive post-judgment motion is pending, no claim was left unresolved when final judgment was docketed, and the motion fails to identify any proceeding in which the defendant would require representation. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/5/2016. (JLS) Modified on 7/5/2016 (JLS).

December 9, 2015

Filing 7 ENTRY Discussing Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying Certificate of Appealability - Gaulden's motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and the underlying record fail to show that her conviction has be en entered in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States. That motion [dkt. 1] is therefore denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. The court finds that Gaulden has failed to show that reasonable jurists woul d find it "debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/09/2015.(JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GAULDEN v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: LYNDA GAULDEN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?