FAULKNER v. COLVIN

FAULKNER v. COLVIN

Plaintiff:	KENDRA FAULKNER
Defendant:	CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneous:	SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number:	1:2014cv01767
Filed:	October 29, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 10, 2016	Filing 34 ENTRY REVIEWING THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION. The Court VACATES the ALJ's decision denying K.F.'s application for SSI benefits on behalf of D.J.K. and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings. On remand, the ALJ should develop a full and fair record to determine whether K.F. had good cause to miss the hearing. (See entry.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/10/2016. (BGT)
July 31, 2015	Filing 24 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons explained, the Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. [Filing No. 16.] The Court will issue a briefing schedule for the parties to solely address whether substantial evidence and the appro priate procedures underlie the Commissioner's decision that good cause did not exist for Ms. Faulkner's failure to appear at the scheduled hearing. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/31/2015. (BGT) Modified on 7/31/2015 (BGT).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 10, 2016

Filing 34 ENTRY REVIEWING THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION. The Court VACATES the ALJ's decision denying K.F.'s application for SSI benefits on behalf of D.J.K. and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings. On remand, the ALJ should develop a full and fair record to determine whether K.F. had good cause to miss the hearing. (See entry.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/10/2016. (BGT)

July 31, 2015

Filing 24 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons explained, the Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. [Filing No. 16.] The Court will issue a briefing schedule for the parties to solely address whether substantial evidence and the appro priate procedures underlie the Commissioner's decision that good cause did not exist for Ms. Faulkner's failure to appear at the scheduled hearing. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/31/2015. (BGT) Modified on 7/31/2015 (BGT).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FAULKNER v. COLVIN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KENDRA FAULKNER
Represented By:	Charles D. Hankey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Miscellaneous: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?