NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
| DERRICK D. NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL |
| WENDY KNIGHT |
| 1:2015cv00363 |
| March 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
Entry Sustaining Defense of Failure to Exhaust Available Administrative Remedies and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - In this civil rights action brought by Mr. Neely-Bey Tarik-El, he alleges his rights under the First Amendment were violated by the defendants when they allegedly enforced a restriction placed on him by the Moorish Science Temple of America that suspended him from participating in religious services. His claims are brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He seeks injun ctive relief. In light of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), is that Mr. Neely-Bey Tarik-El's action should not have been brought and must now be dismissed without prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 11/10/2016.(RSF)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying 22 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 25 Motion in response to defendants claim. An Entry setting a date for a telephonic conference and a Pavey hearing will issue separately. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 2/11/2016 (dist made) (CBU)
|
|
Filing
12
Entry Discussing Complaint. Dismissing Insufficient Claims and Directing Further Proceedings: As an initial matter, the plaintiff's motion for leave to file amend complaint [dkt. 11] is denied as unnecessary in light of the Court 9;s Entry dated May 5, 2015, directing the plaintiff to file an amended complaint. The clerk is instructed to re-file the document at docket Entry 11 as the amended complaint. The plaintiff's claim against defendant M. Doles-Bay must be dismissed. The case shall proceed as to the First Amendment claims against Wendy Knight and David Smith. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) to issue process to the defendants Wendy Knight and David Smith in the manner specified by Rule 4(d) ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 7/29/2015. Copy sent via US Mail. (DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. KNIGHT | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WENDY KNIGHT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DERRICK D. NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
